Categories
Effective Teaching Approach Kindergarten

The Mediating Role of Playfulness: Linking Parental Play Support to Creative Thinking in Hong Kong Kindergartens

Play is theorized as a crucial way children express and develop their creativity. Grounded in the bioecological model of human development and Vygotsky’s theories on play and creativity, Fung and Chung (2025) aim to address a gap in research by examining how family factors within a child’s microsystem influence creative potential. While previous research often defined creative potential solely as personality traits, Fung and Chung (2025) operationalize it through cognitive processes: divergent thinking (generating multiple solutions) and convergent thinking (deducing the single best solution). They hypothesized that parental beliefs about play would indirectly foster these creative thinking skills by nurturing children’s playfulness.

The participants were 181 children (aged 4 to 5 years; 54.1% girls) recruited from nine kindergartens in Hong Kong, along with their parents. Data collection involved both parent-reported questionnaires and direct behavioral assessments of the children. Parents completed the Parent Play Beliefs Scale (PPBS) to measure their support for play and the Children’s Playfulness Scale (CPS) to assess their child’s playfulness across five dimensions: physical, social, and cognitive spontaneity, manifest joy, and sense of humor. Children’s creative thinking was assessed directly: convergent thinking was measured using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R), while divergent thinking was evaluated using the figural circle task from the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT), where children drew pictures based on circles.

Preliminary analyses showed that all five aspects of playfulness were positively correlated with parental play support, but only social spontaneity and cognitive spontaneity significantly correlated with the children’s creative thinking processes. A path analytic model was used to test the relationships, revealing that the direct link between parental play support and children’s creative thinking was non-significant. Instead, the relationship was fully mediated: parental play support positively predicted social spontaneity, which in turn predicted convergent thinking, and it positively predicted cognitive spontaneity, which predicted divergent thinking. The model demonstrated adequate fit, confirming that the influence of parental support on creativity operates through specific aspects of the child’s playful behavior.

Fung and Chung (2025) conclude that parental play support is a crucial environmental factor that fosters creative potential, but it does so indirectly by nurturing a child’s playfulness rather than directly teaching creative skills. Specifically, parents who value play create an environment that encourages social and cognitive spontaneity, which are the specific drivers of convergent and divergent thinking respectively. This finding supports the bioecological model, highlighting how the home microsystem shapes child development. Practically, Fung and Chung (2025) suggest that to enhance creativity in early childhood—a critical period for development—educators and policymakers should focus on interventions that help parents understand the value of play and promote playful behaviors in the household.

 

Source (Open Access): Fung, W. K., & Chung, K. K. H. (2025). Interrelationships Among Parental Play Support and Kindergarten Children’s Playfulness and Creative Thinking Processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101907.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101907

 … Read the rest

Categories
Effective Teaching Approach Maths and Science Learning Primary School Education

Spatially-Enhanced Science Instruction in Elementary Schools: Evidence from a Randomized Study

Gagnier et al. (2026) examine whether embedding spatial thinking practices into elementary science instruction can enhance teachers’ and students’ spatial skills. Rather than relying on stand-alone spatial training, the study evaluates a spatially-enhanced (SE) science curriculum that integrates five spatial strategies—gesture, spatial comparison, spatial language, sketching, and explicit visualization instruction—into daily classroom teaching. The intervention was implemented across an academic year with 35 third-grade teachers and 572 students from a large urban U.S. school district serving predominantly historically underrepresented populations.

Using a randomized design, teachers and students were assigned to one of three conditions: business-as-usual instruction, an NGSS-aligned curriculum (NGSS: Next Generation Science Standards), or an NGSS-aligned curriculum with embedded spatial enhancements. The NGSS-aligned curriculum emphasized core disciplinary ideas, science and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts specified in NGSS, but did not include explicit instruction targeting spatial thinking. By contrast, the spatially-enhanced condition incorporated the same NGSS-aligned content while systematically embedding the five spatial strategies into instructional activities.

Pre- and post-assessments of spatial skills were administered to both teachers and students. Hierarchical linear regression results indicate that teachers exposed to the spatially-enhanced curriculum demonstrated significantly stronger gains in overall spatial reasoning, particularly in spatial visualization, compared with their counterparts in the other conditions. In contrast, student gains in spatial skills were more modest and did not consistently reach statistical significance.

The findings highlight teachers as a critical leverage point for spatially-enhanced instruction. By integrating spatial thinking into everyday science teaching and professional learning, the study demonstrates a feasible, curriculum-embedded approach to strengthening teachers’ spatial competencies. While student outcomes appear more sensitive to implementation and contextual factors, the research underscores the promise of spatially-enhanced curricula as a scalable pathway for enriching STEM instruction in elementary education.

Source (Open Access): Gagnier, K. M., Holochwost, S. J., Tomazin, L., Alsayegh, S., Fatahi, N., Gold, B., & Fisher, K. R. (2025). Spatially-enhanced science instruction in elementary school: Impacts on teachers’ and students’ spatial skills. Learning and Instruction, 102248.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102248… Read the rest

Categories
Achievement Maths and Science Learning Secondary School Education

Flipped Classroom vs. Traditional Teaching in Enhancing Mathematics Achievement and Interest Among Secondary School Students

Using a quasi-experimental non-equivalent pretest–posttest control group design, this study investigated how a flipped classroom learning approach influences mathematics achievement and interest among senior secondary one students learning circle theorems in Igbo Etiti, Enugu State, Nigeria. It evaluated changes in mathematics achievement and mathematics interest among 86 students drawn from a population of 673 students in 15 public secondary schools, with 45 students in classes assigned to the flipped classroom condition and 41 in classes taught with the conventional method. Intact classes in two schools with functional ICT facilities and reliable electricity were randomly assigned at the class level to the experimental or control condition, and students completed a 20-item Mathematics Achievement Test and a 20-item Mathematics Interest Inventory, both validated and reliable, before and after a four-week instructional unit on circle theorems. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and analysis of covariance with pretest scores as covariates to examine the effects of instructional approach and gender on posttest achievement and interest.

The results indicated that the flipped classroom produced substantially greater gains in mathematics achievement than the conventional method: the experimental group’s mean achievement scores increased from 60.8 to 86.1, compared with an increase from 62.0 to 64.7 in the control group, and the treatment effect was significant with a large effect size (partial eta squared = 0.585) and no significant main effect of gender. For mathematics interest, the flipped classroom group’s mean scores rose from 58.7 to 68.4, whereas the control group remained virtually unchanged (57.8 to 57.6), with a significant treatment effect and a large effect size (partial eta squared = 0.419) and no significant main effect of gender. Within the flipped classroom group, both male and female students improved in achievement (from 63.2 to 84.9 for males and from 58.8 to 87.2 for females) and in interest (from 57.5 to 68.9 for males and from 59.8 to 68.0 for females), and analysis of covariance showed no significant gender differences in posttest scores on either outcome. These findings show that the flipped classroom approach outperformed conventional teaching in enhancing both mathematics achievement and interest without creating gender disparities.

The findings suggest that providing video-based pre-class instruction combined with interactive, activity-oriented in-class learning enables students to engage more deeply with circle theorems, thereby improving both their performance in mathematics and their interest in the subject. The authors conclude that mathematics teachers should adopt the flipped classroom approach, especially for geometry topics such as circle theorems, and that educational authorities and professional bodies should organise workshops, seminars and in-service training to build teachers’ capacity to design and implement flipped instruction. They further recommend that school principals ensure adequate ICT resources and reliable power supply so that flipped classrooms can be implemented effectively to enhance students’ mathematics achievement and interest.

 

Source (Open Access): Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Effect of flipped classroom learning approach on mathematics achievement and interest among secondary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8131-8150.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12145-1… Read the rest

Categories
Effective Teaching Approach K-12 Education Programme Evaluation

Equity in Teacher Education Programs: Conceptions and Program-Level Efforts

Ko-Wong (2025) conducts a systematic review to examine how teacher education programs (TEPs) in the United States conceptualize, implement, and prioritize equity. Drawing on 58 empirical studies that met rigorous inclusion criteria, the review synthesizes program-level equity efforts across coursework, field placements, recruitment strategies, faculty development, and structural reforms. The analysis highlights substantial conceptual ambiguity: many programs invoke equity rhetorically while relying on race-evasive framings, thin interpretations of fairness, or narrow emphases on access and achievement. Few studies explicitly address Whiteness, racism, power, or meritocracy—core constructs in critical equity frameworks.

Using an adapted strong-equity lens, the review finds that most TEPs focus on surface-level or fragmented activities, such as required multicultural courses or isolated field experiences, which often lack coherence and long-term impact. Although coursework and community-based placements can support preservice teachers’ awareness of diverse learners, evidence suggests that these efforts frequently fall short of transforming candidates’ racial literacy or challenging institutional hierarchies. Only a limited subset of programs adopt more systemic approaches that integrate equity across curricula, partnerships, supervision, and program structures.

The findings underscore the persistent gap between equity rhetoric and equity enactment in teacher preparation. Ko-Wong argues that meaningful progress requires programs to name and confront systemic racism, destabilize dominant ideologies such as color-evasiveness and meritocracy, and reimagine TEPs as sites of structural change rather than individual skill development. The review concludes with recommendations for advancing strong equity through conceptual clarity, coherent program design, and deeper engagement with racial justice frameworks.

Source (Open Access): Ko-Wong, L. (2025). Equity in Teacher Education Programs: A Systematic Review of Conceptions and Program-Level Efforts. Review of Educational Research, 00346543251382579.

https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251382579… Read the rest

Categories
Primary School Education Social and Motivational Outcomes

More Than Just Grades: Why Social Emotional Learning Matters in Early Hong Kong Education

Educational transition from kindergarten to primary school in Hong Kong is a key milestone in children’s lives. While this milestone is known to shape long-term academic and social success, existing literature is mostly in Western contexts, leaving a gap in understanding the experience in Eastern educational systems characterized by high academic pressure and distinctive cultural values. Zhoc, Tse & King (2025) aim to examine the multifaceted transition experiences of children, specifically focusing on their academic and social challenges. By identifying these factors, Zhoc, Tse & King (2025) seek to highlight the necessity of Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) in facilitating smoother adjustments and optimal functioning for young students entering a more formal, assessment-driven primary school environment.

To capture a holistic view of the transition process, Zhoc, Tse & King (2025) conducted a qualitative research design involving multiple stakeholders from four government-aided, co-educational primary schools in Hong Kong. The primary data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 38 children from Primary 1 and Primary 2, aged 6-8. To ensure the reliability of the children’s perspectives and provide triangulation, the study also conducted focus group discussions with 15 class teachers and 17 parents from the four schools. The data was analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and core themes regarding the children’s transition experiences.

The analysis revealed three major themes characterizing the transition: positive experiences, academic problems, and social problems. Positively, many children enjoyed making friends, engaging in new learning activities, and receiving support from adults. However, significant challenges were evident. Academic struggles included immense pressure from high self-expectations and parental demands, frustration over test results, and a heavy workload of homework and dictations. Socially, some children reported difficulties in forming friendships, feelings of loneliness, and involvement in hostile interactions or conflicts. The findings paint a picture of a “drilling to learn” culture where academic stress is prevalent, and social skills are often underdeveloped.

Zhoc, Tse & King (2025) conclude that early Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) is indispensable for navigating the complex demands of the Hong Kong education system. They interpret that academic stress from cultural values could equate to the achievement with family pride, leading to the necessity of interventions that foster a “growth mindset” to help children view failure as part of learning. Socially, the study highlights a critical need to teach prosocial behaviors, conflict resolution, and emotion regulation. Ultimately, Zhoc, Tse & King (2025) argue that successful transitions depend not just on academic readiness, but on equipping children with the psychological resources to manage stress and build supportive relationships.

 

Source (Open Access): Zhoc, K. C., Tse, J. K., & King, R. B. (2025). The importance of social and emotional learning in facilitating positive transitions from kindergarten to primary school in Hong Kong. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 1476718X251349938.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X251349938… Read the rest

Categories
Higher Education

The Role of Undergraduates’ Critical Thinking in Generative AI Reliance Behaviors

Hou and colleagues conducted a large-scale survey study using structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine how undergraduates’ critical thinking influences their different types of reliance on generative AI during problem-solving tasks. The study analyzed 808 valid responses, measuring students’ critical thinking skills and dispositions, AI literacy, trust in AI, and four types of AI-use behaviors—reflective, cautious, collaborative, and thoughtless use. The authors conceptualized reliance behavior as the way learners evaluate and make use of the differences between AI and human abilities, and proposed that critical thinking may play a key moderating role in this process.

The results showed that AI literacy strongly predicted both critical thinking skills (β = .66, p < .001) and dispositions (β = .41, p < .001), whereas trust in AI was negatively related to both (skills: β = –.16, p < .05; disposition: β = –.11, p < .001). Regarding reliance behaviors, critical thinking skills were positively associated with collaborative use (β = .25), reflective use (β = .21), and cautious use (β = .24), with similar effects found for critical thinking disposition. These findings highlight the importance of critical thinking in supporting desirable forms of AI use. In contrast, trust strongly predicted thoughtless use (β = .47, p < .001) and also slightly increased collaborative use (β = .15, p < .05) and reflective use (β = .19, p < .001), indicating a dual role of trust in both strengthening and weakening ideal reliance behaviors. More importantly, AI literacy promoted collaborative (β = .25), reflective (β = .20), and cautious use (β = .22) through the mediation of critical thinking, whereas trust produced negative indirect effects on these desirable behaviors because it reduced critical thinking (β = –.05 to –.06, p < .001). This means that critical thinking both enhances the positive influence of AI literacy and suppresses the potential blind reliance brought by high trust, guiding learners toward more reflective, careful, and collaborative ways of using AI.

Overall, the study provides strong evidence that critical thinking does not simply reduce AI reliance; instead, it shapes how students rely on AI, encouraging forms of use that are more reflective, collaborative, and prudent. The authors argue that the development of AI literacy must be accompanied by the cultivation of critical thinking to reduce thoughtless dependence and to promote healthier human–AI collaboration. They also emphasize that educational interventions should clearly define “ideal reliance behaviors” and help students develop responsible and thoughtful habits of AI use in an era where generative AI is becoming increasingly widespread.

Source (Open Access): Hou, C., Zhu, G., & Sudarshan, V. (2025). The role of critical thinking on undergraduates’ reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1919-1941.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13613… Read the rest