Student leadership is widely recognized as an important life skill associated with academic, psychological, and social benefits. However, school-based leadership opportunities are often offered to students who already display leadership qualities, while those who may benefit most from such opportunities are less likely to participate. Existing leadership research has also focused mainly on adults, leaving limited evidence on how leadership skills can be developed among young students. To address this gap, this study evaluated Learning to Lead, a peer-led, school-based leadership and fundamental movement skills program grounded in transformational leadership theory.
The study used a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial design involving 20 elementary schools in Australia. A total of 1,898 students participated, including 952 older students as Leaders and 946 younger students as Peers. Schools were randomized to either the intervention group or a wait-list control group after baseline assessment. The intervention consisted of teacher professional development, six leadership lessons delivered by trained teachers to student Leaders, and twelve peer-led fundamental movement skill sessions delivered by Leaders to younger Peers. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately after the intervention. Leader outcomes included teacher-reported leadership effectiveness, self-reported leadership ability, leadership self-efficacy, wellbeing, and classroom time on-task. Peer outcomes included physical activity, perceived and actual motor competence, cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscular fitness.
The results showed that the L2L program produced significant benefits for both Leaders and Peers. For Leaders, teacher-reported leadership effectiveness improved significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group, with an adjusted between-group difference of 0.56 units and an effect size of d = 0.39. The intervention also produced positive spillover effects: Leaders showed significantly greater wellbeing, with an adjusted difference of 0.77 units, and their classroom time on-task increased by approximately 7 percentage points. However, the program did not significantly improve Leaders’ self-reported leadership ability or leadership self-efficacy. For Peers, the intervention significantly improved perceived motor competence, with an adjusted difference of 1.12 units, increased daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity by 3.02 minutes per day, and improved cardiorespiratory fitness by 2.57 laps. Moderator analysis showed that the effect on perceived motor competence was significant for both boys and girls, but stronger among boys. However, the program did not significantly improve Peers’ actual motor competence or muscular fitness.
Taken together, the findings suggest that peer-led leadership programs can improve student leaders’ observable leadership effectiveness and generate broader benefits for their wellbeing and classroom engagement. The program also benefited younger peers by improving their perceived motor competence, physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness. These findings indicate that school-based peer-led interventions can meaningfully integrate leadership development with physical activity promotion. Nevertheless, the study has several limitations, including short-term outcome assessment, possible teacher expectancy effects in ratings of student leadership, possible awareness of group allocation among video coders, and the challenge of relying on student Leaders who were still developing their own leadership and movement skills. Future research should examine the long-term effects of such programs and consider providing stronger instructional support for student Leaders.
Source (Open Access): Wade, L., Beauchamp, M. R., Nathan, N., Smith, J. J., Leahy, A. A., Bao, R., Kennedy, S. G., Boyer, J., Diallo, T. M. O., Beacroft, S., & Lubans, D. R. (2026). Effects of a school-based leadership program on student leaders and their peers: The Learning to Lead cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 102444.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2026.102444… Read the rest