Jaggy et al. (2025) investigate how gifted students perceive teaching quality in specialized STEM enrichment programs compared with their regular school classrooms. Previous research has shown that high-ability students often experience learning environments differently from their peers, yet little is known about how participation in extracurricular enrichment programs influences students’ evaluation of teaching quality in both in-school and out-of-school settings. To address this gap, the study examines students attending the Hector Seminar, a specialized STEM enrichment program for gifted secondary school students in Germany and compares their perceptions of teaching quality across learning contexts.
The study uses cross-sectional data from a large-scale talent development project including academically advanced sixth- and seventh-grade students in the German state of Baden-Württemberg. Teaching quality was assessed using student reports on six indicators derived from the three-basic-dimensions model of instructional quality: effective classroom management, cognitive activation, student support, adaptivity, interestingness, and motivational climate. Two research questions guided the analysis: whether gifted students evaluate teaching quality in the enrichment program higher than in regular school classes, and whether students attending the program perceive regular classroom teaching differently from comparable students who do not participate in the program.
Results show that students attending the specialized STEM enrichment program rated teaching quality significantly higher in the program than in their regular school classes across most indicators, particularly in interestingness, motivational climate, and adaptivity. These findings suggest that enrichment programs provide highly stimulating and supportive learning environments for gifted students. Importantly, however, participation in the enrichment program did not lead students to evaluate their regular school teaching more negatively compared with non-participants, indicating that potential reference effects between learning contexts were limited.
Overall, the study highlights the importance of specialized enrichment programs as high-quality learning environments for gifted students while showing that such programs do not necessarily undermine students’ perceptions of regular classroom instruction. The findings contribute to research on gifted education and teaching quality by demonstrating that macro-level adaptations, such as structured STEM enrichment programs, can enhance learning experiences without producing negative comparison effects. The results also underscore the need for teacher professional development and more individualized instruction to better support diverse student needs across learning settings.
Source (Open Access): Jaggy, A. K., Wagner, W., Fütterer, T., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2025). Teaching quality in STEM education: Differences between in-and out-of-school contexts from the perspective of gifted students. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 53.