Guo et al. (2025) investigate whether university-led STEM programs function as gender equalizers in shaping undergraduates’ career commitment in STEM. Grounded in Social Cognitive Career Theory, the study examines how four program factors (i.e., course resources, research opportunities, mentoring quality, and peer interactions) relate to students’ STEM career commitment, and whether these relationships differ by gender through the mediating roles of STEM professional self-efficacy and perceptions of STEM professionals. Data were drawn from a nationwide survey of 19,108 undergraduates from 39 leading Chinese universities participating in the Strong Foundation Program, a large-scale initiative designed to cultivate elite STEM talent.
Using t-tests, regression analyses, and multi-group structural equation modeling, the authors compared gender differences among both program participants and non-participants. Results show that although men reported higher overall STEM career commitment in the full sample, this gender gap disappeared among students enrolled in the university-led STEM program. Women participants even reported more favorable experiences in course resources, research opportunities, and mentoring quality, whereas men reported stronger peer interactions. These findings suggest that structured university programs may substantially reduce gender disparities in STEM career commitment.
Regression results further indicate that all four program factors positively predicted STEM career commitment. Course resources and research opportunities were particularly influential for women students, while peer interactions exerted a stronger effect for men students. Mentoring quality showed comparable effects across genders. These patterns highlight gender-differentiated sensitivities to specific institutional supports within STEM programs.
Multi-group mediation analyses revealed distinct gender-specific pathways. For women students, course resources and research opportunities enhanced STEM career commitment primarily through STEM professional self-efficacy and positive perceptions of STEM professionals. In contrast, men students’ career commitment was shaped more strongly by peer interactions via perceptions of STEM professionals. Mentoring quality demonstrated similar indirect effects for both groups. Together, these findings underscore that equal access does not imply identical developmental mechanisms.
Overall, the study demonstrates that thoughtfully structured university-led STEM programs can act as effective gender equalizers in career commitment outcomes, even when women remain numerically under-represented in participation. By revealing gender-specific psychological and contextual pathways, the research extends Social Cognitive Career Theory and provides important implications for designing targeted STEM policies and support systems in higher education.
Source (Open Access): Guo, C., Wu, W., Hu, T., & Gao, T. (2025). Unequal access, equal outcomes? Gender differences in the relationship between university-led STEM program factors and undergraduates’ career commitment in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 46.