Site icon 卓越實證概述 Best Evidence in Brief

How can a growth mindset intervention help students?

Mindsets or implicit theories are terms which refer to various subconscious beliefs about the malleability of human attributes (e.g., intelligence and emotion). Huang and colleagues recently conducted a pilot experiment to examine the effect of a growth mindset intervention on students’ implicit theory of intelligence, intrinsic motivation, and academic achievement. The authors extended the intervention to establish a belief about the malleability of emotion so that students can regulate their emotion and thereby enhance their sense of self-determination, which is likely to reinforce their intrinsic motivation for learning.

Students of 11 primary and middle schools across 48 classes from 2 cities in Guangdong Province, China, were recruited to sign up to the program. Participating students were randomly assigned either to the intervention group or the placebo-control group. The final sample consisted of 194 students (mean age = 11.3 years) in the intervention group and 213 students (mean age = 11.5 years) in the control group. A 90-minute workshop was conducted with both groups separately with different content. While the structure and function of the brain were introduced in the workshops of both groups, only the following contents were introduced in the intervention group:

In contrast, teachers in the control group only taught about the brain functions, its different regions and mnemonic strategies. After controlling for pre-tests scores, gender, and age, the results indicated:

Though the intervention period was very brief and the effect on math scores was small, the study provided preliminary empirical evidence to support the implementation of growth mindset related interventions for Chinese students.

 

Source: Huang, Z., Wei, X., Lu, R., & Shi, J. (2022). Whether and how can a growth mindset intervention help students in a non-western culture? Evidence from a field experiment in China. Educational Psychology, 42(7), 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2085669

 

Exit mobile version