Site icon 卓越實證概述 Best Evidence in Brief

Planning ahead for summer

Heather L. Schwartz and colleagues from the RAND Corporation have released a final report on a six-year study of the National Summer Learning Project, an initiative from The Wallace Foundation that was implemented in 2011 in five urban school districts. The summer programs in these districts were district-led, voluntary summer learning programs that featured both academic instruction and enrichment opportunities to improve outcomes for low-income students.

The overall study combined a randomized controlled trial with correlational analysis and implementation research to examine whether voluntary, district-run summer learning programs can improve academic, behavioral, and social and emotional outcomes for low-income, urban youth in both the short and long terms. The study followed approximately 5,600 students from third to seventh grade. Data included surveys, observations, and test data.

Findings showed that students who received a minimum of 25 hours of mathematics instruction in a summer performed better on the subsequent state math test, and those receiving 34 hours of language arts performed better on the subsequent state English language arts assessment. These outcomes need to be viewed with caution, however, as students who actually attended summer school, as opposed to those who signed up but did not attend, are likely to be more highly motivated and better achieving, introducing possible bias.

Based on their research, the authors offer several recommendations for planning for summer learning, including:

A more detailed and comprehensive list of recommendations can be found in the report.


Source (open access): Schwartz, H. L., Jennifer S. M., Catherine H. A., & Jennifer T. L. (2018). Getting to work on summer learning: Recommended practices for success (2nd edition). Santa Monica, CA: RAND corporation.

Exit mobile version